コンテンツへスキップ
UwView Info Site
  • About
  • Benchmark
  • User Guide
  • UwView Pro
  • CLI command
  • News
  • Download
  • Support
  • Help
  • Privacy Policy
  • 日本語
  • English

uvf

Technical Guide

The Day We Wrote “This Is Not a Speed Tool” — Breaking Down 205 Seconds by How Many Times We Read the File

205 seconds, to search 50 GB. "This is not a speed tool. If you have ripgrep, use ripgrep." We wrote that ours…
2026.09.22
Technical Guide
Technical

The Free uvf Holds Its Own Against Both ripgrep and klogg. uvp Earns Its Keep at the Second Question — One 51 GB File, Three Arenas

We spent three months measuring one 51.25 GB file on the same machines. The answer that came out was simpler t…
2026.09.21
Technical
Technical

We Lose to klogg on Opening. uvf Wins the Whole Run — Re-measured at 50 GB

If all you do is open a 51 GB file, klogg is faster. 52.55 s against 100.6 s. That one we lose. [Added 2026-09…
2026.09.20
Technical
Technical

ripgrep Is 2.9x Faster With no-mmap — Measured Against the Default mmap Read on One 51 GB File, on Three OSes

Searching a 51 GB file with ripgrep, adding --no-mmap can make it faster. On Windows, by up to 2.89×. On macOS…
2026.09.19
Technical
Technical

The UwView Window Caught Up With uvf … -open — 50 GB End to End, From 189.5 s to 53.7 s

[Correction, 21 Sept 2026] When this went up, the uvf … -open figure we compared against, 53.69 s, was the v1.…
2026.09.19
Technical
UwView Info Site
© 2026 UwView Info Site.
    • About
    • Benchmark
    • User Guide
    • UwView Pro
    • CLI command
    • News
    • Download
    • Support
    • Help
    • Privacy Policy
    • 日本語
    • English
  • Home
  • Top